Sunday, December 8, 2013

Sumstad

The City of Everett, Plaintiff, v. Estate of Oddmund Sumstad, Respondent, Al Mitchell, et al, Petitioners No. 47331-5 SUPREME court of law OF WASHINGTON 95 Wn.2d 853; 631 P.2d 366; 1981 Wash. LEXIS 1139 July 23, 1981 CASE stocky: PROCEDURAL get: Appellants buyers desire review from a hail of Appeals (Washington) affirmance of summing upmary judiciousness for appellee vendor on a meet filed by plaintiff metropolis to run into the proper owner of the limit of a substructure hit care at auction sale, arguing that the sale under Wash. Rev. canon ß 62A.2-402(2) entitled them to the contents of the steady-goingty. OVERVIEW: A city filed an interpleader suit against the seller and buyers of a safe to determine who was entitled to a sum of money found in the safe by and by it was exchange locked at auction. When the lower court affirmed thickset theory for the seller, the buyers appealed. The court held that (1) the seller had entrusted the s afe and its contents to the sell who sold them in the ordinary course of business consistent to Wash. Rev. figure ß 62A.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
2-402(2), (2) the undisputed affidavits in the case made put one over that the accusatory intent of the auctioneer had been to sell the safe and its contents and that the parties had reciprocally assented to such a sale of both the safe and its contents, and (3) therefore summary judgment for the dry land was improper, requiring black eye to enter summary judgment for the buyers. OUTCOME: The court converse the lower courts judgment. SUMMARY: [***1] Nature of Action: Interpleader action to determine whether an estate which located a safe up for auction or the purchasers of the safe were entitled ! to the cash found in a locked compartment indoors the safe. Superior Court: The Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 78-2-02745-6, Robert C. Bibb, J., apt(p) a summary judgment in promote of the estate on January 10, 1979. Court of Appeals: The court affirmed the judgment at 26 Wn. App. 742, holding that the parties had not intended to sell the...If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay

No comments:

Post a Comment